Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-496 |
| Words | 386 |
“But it is inconsistent with what you said elsewhere:
“To make it a point of conscience to differ from others, as
the Quakers do, in the shape or colour of their apparel, is
mere superstition.’”
Not inconsistent at all. It is mere superstition to make
wearing a broad-brimmed hat, or a coat with four buttons,
(the very thing I referred to in the preceding page,) a point
of conscience; that is, a thing necessary to salvation. “Why then,” says Mr. H., “we are to increase our
reward, and brighten our crown in heaven, by doing what is
‘mere superstition, and without acting from a ‘point of
conscience l’”
436 REMARKs on MR. HILL’s
Was ever such twisting of words? Has he not great
reason to cry out, “O rare Logica Wesleiensis / Qui bene
distinguit bene docet !”* I bless God, I can distinguish
reason from sophistry; unkind, unjust, ungenteel sophistry,
used purely for this good end,--to asperse, to blacken a
fellow-Christian, because he is not a Calvinist ! No, Sir; what I call “superstition, and no point of
conscience,” is wearing a Quaker hat or coat; which is
widely different from the plainness of dress that I recom
mend to the people called Methodists. My logic, therefore, stands unimpeached; I wish your
candour did so too. I would engage to answer every objection of Mr. H.’s, as
fairly and fully as this. But I cannot spare so much time;
I am called to other employment. And I should really think Mr. H. might spend his time
better than in throwing dirt at his quiet neighbours. Of Tea. 37. “Mr. W. published a tract against drinking tea, and
told the tea-drinkers he would set them an example in that
piece of self-denial.” (Farrago, p. 41.)
“I did set them an example for twelve years. Then, at
the close of a consumption, by Dr. Fothergill’s direction, I
used it again.” (Remarks, p. 393.)
“Why then did Mr. W. re-publish this tract, making the
world believe it brought a paralytic disorder upon him?”
Before I was twenty years old, it made my hand shake, so
that I could hardly write. “Is it not strange then, that Dr. Fothergill should advise Mr. W. to use what had before
thrown him into the palsy ?” I did not say so.