Wesley Collected Works Vol 9
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-9-347 |
| Words | 399 |
But this does
not amount to a natural propensity to sin.” (Page 186.) But
is not pride sin Is not idolatry sin? And is it not idolatry,
to “love the creature more than the Creator?” Is not
revenge sin? Is it not sin to “look upon a woman,” so as
“to lust after her?” And have not all men a natural pro
pensity to these things? They have all, then, a natural
propensity to sin. Nevertheless, this propensity is not
necessary, if by necessary you mean irresistible. We can
resist and conquer it too, by the grace which is ever at hand. This propensity to pride, to revenge, to idolatry, (call it
taint, or anything,) cannot be pleasing to God, who yet in
fact does permit that it should descend from Adam to his
latest posterity. And “we can neither help nor hinder” its
descending to us. Indeed we can heap up plausible argu
ments to prove the impossibility of it: But I feel it, and the
argument drops. Bring ever so many proofs that there can
be no such thing as motion: I move, and they vanish away. “But nature cannot be morally corrupted, but by the
choice of a moral agent.” (Page 187.) You may play upon
words as long as you please; but still I hold this fast: I (and
you too, whether you will own it or no) am inclined, and was
ever since I can remember, antecedently to any choice of my
own, to pride, revenge, idolatry. If you will not call these
moral corruptions, call them just what you will; but the fact
I am as well assured of, as that I have any memory or under
standing. “But some have attempted to explain this intricate affair.”
(Page 188.) I do not commend their wisdom. I do not
attempt to explain even how I, at this moment, stretch out
my hand, or move my finger. One more of your assertions I must not pass over “It is
absurd to say, infection is derived from Adam, independent
of the will of God; and to say, it is by his will, is to make
him the author of the pollution.” (Page 189.)
We answer: It is not derived from Adam, independent of
the will of God; that is, his permissive will. But our allow
ing this, does not make him the author of the pollution.