Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-527 |
| Words | 384 |
Again: If all the actions, and passions, and tempers of
men are quite independent on their own choice, are governed
by a principle exterior to themselves; then none of them is
either rewardable or punishable, is either praise or blame
worthy. The consequence is undeniable: I cannot praise the
sun forwarming, nor blame the stone for wounding me; because
neither the sun nor the stone acts from choice, but from neces
sity. Therefore, neither does the latter deserve blame, nor the
former deserve praise. Neither is the one capable of reward,
nor the other of punishment. And if a man does good as
necessarily as the sun, he is no more praiseworthy than that; if
he does evil as necessarily as the stone, he is no more blame
worthy. The dying to save your country is noway rewardable,
if you are compelled thereto; and the betraying your country
is noway punishable, if you are necessitated to do it. 3. It follows, if there be no such thing as virtue or vice, as
moral good or evil, if there be nothing rewardable or punish
able in the actions or passions of men, then there can be no
judgment to come, and no future rewards and punishments. For might not God as well judge the trees of the wood, or
the stones of the field, as man, if man was as totally passive
as they? as irresistibly determined to act thus or thus? What should he be commended or rewarded for, who never
did any good but when he could not help it, being impelled
thereto by a force which he could not withstand? What
should he be blamed or punished for, who never did any evil,
to which he was not determined by a power he could no more
resist, than he could shake the pillars of heaven? This objection the author of the Essay gives in its full
strength: “The advocates for liberty reason thus: If actions
be necessary, and not in our own power, what ground is there
for blame, self-condemnation, or remorse? If a clock were
sensible of its own motions, and knew that they proceeded
according to necessary laws, could it find fault with itself for
striking wrong? Would it not blame the artist, who had so
ill adjusted the wheels?