Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-432 |
| Words | 392 |
Many writers have done marvellously;
but thou excellest them all ! For forty or fifty years I have
been a little acquainted with controversial writers; some of
the Romish persuasion, some of our own Church, some Dis
senters of various denominations: And I have found many
among them as angry as him; but one so bitter I have not
found: Or one only, the author of those “excellent Letters,”
as Mr. H. styles them; which he particularly “admires,”
(that is his word,) and the “whole spirit” of which he has
drank in. This is his peculiar character, his distinguishing
grace: As a writer, his name is Wormwood. Accordingly, he
charges Mr. F. with a “severe, acrimonious spirit,” with
“sneer, sarcasm, and banter,” yea, with “notorious falsehoods,
calumny, and gross perversions.” (Page 2.) Nay, “I accuse
you,” says he, “of the grossest perversions and misrepresenta
tions that ever proceeded from any author's pen.” In the
same spirit he is represented as “a slanderer of God’s people
and Ministers, descending to the meanest quibbles, with a
bitter, railing, acrimonious spirit;” (page 21;) and, page 27,
to go no farther, as “using stratagem and ungenerous
artifices:” Although “I have treated you,” says Mr. H.,
“with all the politeness of a gentleman, and the humility of a
Christian.” Amazing! And has he not treated me so too? At present, take but one or two instances: “Forgeries have
long passed for no crime with Mr. Wesley.” (Page 27.) “He
administers falsehoods and damnable heresies, rank poison,
hemlock, and ratsbane. We cannot allow him any other title
than that of an empiric or quack-doctor.” (Page 29.) Which
shall we admire most here,--the gentleman or the Christian? MR. HILL's REVIEw. 377
4. There is something extremely odd in this whole affair. A man falls upon another, and gives him a good beating; who,
in order to be revenged, does not grapple with him, (perhaps
sensible that he is above his match,) but, giving him two or
three kicks, falls upon a third man that was standing by. “O,” says he, “but I know that fellow well; he is the second
of him that beat me.”--“If he is, dispatch your business with
the former first, and then turn to him.” However, if Mr. H. is
resolved to fall upon me, I must defend myself as well as I can. 5.