Treatise Thoughts Concerning Origin Of Power
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-thoughts-concerning-origin-of-power-005 |
| Words | 399 |
Hitherto we have endeavoured to view this point in the
mere light of reason. And even by this means it manifestly
appears that this supposition, which is so high in vogue, which
is so generally received, nay, which has been palmed upon us
with such confidence, as undeniable and self-evident, is not
only false, not only contrary to reason, but contradictory to
itself; the very men who are most positive that the people
are the source of power, being brought into an inextricable
difficulty, by that single question, “Who are the people?”
reduced to a necessity of either giving up the point, or owning
that by the people they mean scarce a tenth part of them. 17. But we need not rest the matter entirely on reasoning;
let us appeal to matter of fact. And because we cannot
have so clear and certain a prospect of what is at too great a
distance, whether of time or place, let us only take a view of
what has been in our own country for six or seven hundred
years. I ask, then, When and where did the people of England
(even suppose by that word, the people, you mean only an
inundred thousand of them) choose their own Governors? Did they choose, to go no farther, William the Conqueror? Did they choose King Stephen, or King John? As to those
who regularly succeeded their fathers, it is plain the people
are out of the question. Did they choose Henry the Fourth,
Edward the Fourth, or Henry the Seventh? Who will be so
hardy as to affirm it? Did the people of England, or but
fifty thousand of them, choose Queen Mary, or Queen
Elizabeth? To come nearer to our own times, did they choose
King James the First? Perhaps you will say, “But if the
people did not give King Charles the supreme power, at least
they took it away from him. Surely, you will not deny this.”
Indeed I will; I deny it utterly. The people of England no
more took away his power, than they cut off his head. “Yes,
the Parliament did, and they are the people.” No; the
Parliament did not. The lower House, the House of Com
mons, is not the Parliament, any more than it is the nation. Neither were those who then sat the House of Commons;
no; nor one quarter of them.