Treatise Thoughts Concerning Origin Of Power
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-thoughts-concerning-origin-of-power-003 |
| Words | 399 |
And, if they are, why have they not as good a
right as we have to choose their own Governors? Who can
have any power over free, rational creatures, but by their own
consent? And are they not free by nature, as well as we? Are they not rational creatures? 12. But suppose we exclude women from using their
natural right, by might overcoming right, by main strength,
(for it is sure that we are stronger than they; I mean that
we have stronger limbs, if we have not stronger reason,) what
pretence have we for excluding men like ourselves, yea,
thousands and tens of thousands, barely because they have
not lived one-and-twenty years? “Why, they have not
wisdom or experience to judge concerning the qualifications
necessary for Governors.” I answer, (1.) Who has? How
many of the voters in Great Britain? one in twenty? one in
an hundred? If you exclude all who have not this wisdom,
you will leave few behind. But, (2.) Wisdom and experience
are nothing to the purpose. You have put the matter upon
another issue. Are they men? That is enough. Are they
human creatures? Then they have a right to choose their own
Governors; an indefeasible right; a right inherent, insepar
able from human nature. “But in England, at least, they
are excluded by law.” But did they consent to the making
of that law If not, by your original supposition, it can
have no power over them. I therefore utterly deny that we
can, consistently with that supposition, debar either women
or minors from choosing their own Governors. 13. But suppose we exclude these by main force, (which it
is certain we are able to do, since though they have most
votes they have least strength,) are all that remain, all men
of full age, the people? Are all males, then, that have lived
one-and-twenty years allowed to choose their own Governors? “Not at all; not in England, unless they are freeholders,
unless they have forty shillings a year.” Worse and worse. After depriving half the human species of their natural rights
for want of a beard; after depriving myriads more for want
of a stiff beard, for not having lived one-and-twenty years;
you rob others (probably some hundred thousands) of their
birthright for want of money! Yet not altogether on this
account neither; if so, it might be more tolerable.