Treatise Some Observations On Liberty
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-some-observations-on-liberty-024 |
| Words | 368 |
Did the King and Parliament
undertake this war, on purpose to overturn a castle in the air,
to destroy a constitution that never existed ? Or is this said
purely ad movendam invidiam, “to inflame the minds of the
people?” I would rather impute it to the power of preju
dice; as also the following wonderful sentence: “How horrid,
to sheathe our swords in the bowels of our brethren, for no
other end than to make them acknowledge our supremacy l’”
Yes, for this end,--to make them lay down their arms, which
they have taken up against their lawful Sovereign; to make
them restore what they have illegally and violently taken
from their fellow-subjects; to make them repair the cruel
wrongs they have done them, as far as the nature of the thing
will aduit, and to make them allow to all that civil and
religious liberty whereof they have at present deprived them. These are the ends for which our Government has very
unwillingly undertaken this war, after having tried all the
rmethods they could devise to secure them without violence. 44. Having considered the justice, you come now to consider
the policy, of this war. “In the last reigns, the colonies,
foregoing every advantage which they might derive from
trading with foreign nations, consented to send only to us,
whatever it was for our interest to receive from them; and
to receive only from us, whatever it was for our interest to
send them.” (Page 67.) They consented to do this / No ! they only pretended to do it; it was a mere copy of their
countenance. They never did, in fact, abstain from trading
with other nations, Holland and France in particular. They
never did, at least for forty years past, conform to the Act of
Navigation. They did not send only to us what we wanted,
or receive only from us what they wanted. What I did
they not “allow us to regulate their trade in any manner
which we thought best?” (Page 68.) No such thing. They only allowed us to make laws to regulate their trade. But they observed them as they thought best; sometimes a
little, sometimes not at all.