Treatise Some Observations On Liberty
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-some-observations-on-liberty-012 |
| Words | 378 |
But suppose we exclude women from using their
natural right, by might overcoming right, what pretence have
we for excluding men like ourselves, barely because they
have not lived one-and-twenty years? “Why, they have
not wisdom or experience to judge of the qualifications neces
sary for Governors.” I answer, (1.) Who has? how many of
the voters in Great Britain? one in twenty? one in an
hundred? If you exclude all who have not this wisdom, you
will leave few behind. But, (2.) Wisdom and experience are
nothing to the purpose. You have put the matter upon
another issue. Are they men? That is enough. Are they
human creatures? Then they have a right to choose their
own Governors; an indefeasible right; a right inherent,
inseparable from human nature. “But in England they are
excluded by law.” Did they consent to the making of that
law? If not, by your original supposition, it can have no
power over them. I therefore utterly deny that we can,
consistently with that supposition, exclude either women or
minors from choosing their own Governors. 25. But, suppose we exclude these by main force; are all
that remain, all men of full age, the people? Are all males,
then, that have lived one-and-twenty years, allowed to choose
their own Governors? Not in England, unless they are
freeholders, and have forty shillings a year. Worse and
worse! After depriving half the human species of their
natural right for want of a beard; after having deprived
myriads more for want of a stiff beard, for not having lived
one-and-twenty years; you rob others, many hundred thou
sands, of their birthright for want of money ! Yet not alto
gether on this account neither; if so, it might be more tolerable. But here is an Englishman who has money enough to buy
the estates of fifty freeholders, and yet he must not be
numbered among the people, because he has not two or three
acres of land How is this? By what right do you exclude a
man from being one of the people, because he has not forty
shillings a year; yea, or not a groat? Is he not a man, whether
he be rich or poor? Has he not a soul and a body?