Treatise Serious Thoughts Earthquake At Lisbon
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-serious-thoughts-earthquake-at-lisbon-004 |
| Words | 387 |
Of these there is a vast number. That part of the cliff from which the rest is torn, lies so
high and is now of so bright a colour, that it is plainly
visible to all the country round, even at the distance of
several miles. We saw it distinctly, not only from the street
in Thirsk, but for five or six miles after, as we rode toward
York. So we did likewise in the great North Road, between
Sandhutton and Northallerton. But how may we account for this phenomenon? Was it
effected by a merely natural cause? If so, that cause must
either have been fire, water, or air. It could not be fire; for
then some mark of it must have appeared, either at the time,
or after it. But no such mark does appear, nor ever did;
not so much as the least smoke, either when the first or
second rock was removed, or in the whole space between
Tuesday and Sunday. It could not be water; for no water issued out, when the
one or the other rock was torn off. Nor had there been any
rains for some time before. It was in that part of the country
a remarkable dry season. Neither was there any cavity in
that part of the rock, wherein a sufficient quantity of water
might have lodged. On the contrary, it was one single, solid
mass, which was evenly and smoothly cleft in sunder. There remains no other natural cause assignable, but
imprisoned air. I say imprisoned; for as to the fashionable
opinion, that the exterior air is the grand agent in earth
quakes, it is so senseless, unmechanical, unphilosophical a
dream, as deserves not to be named but to be exploded. But
it is hard to conceive, how even imprisoned air could produce
such an effect. It might indeed shake, tear, raise, or sink
the earth; but how could it cleave a solid rock? Here was
not room for a quantity of it sufficient to do anything of
this nature; at least, unless it had been suddenly and
violently expanded by fire, which was not the case. Could a
small quantity of air, without that violent expansion, have
torn so large a body of rock from the rest, to which it
adhered in one solid mass?