Treatise Remarks On Hills Farrago
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-remarks-on-hills-farrago-027 |
| Words | 392 |
395.)
It is now plain he could ! Nay, instead of owning his
unfairness, he endeavours to turn the blame upon me ! “You
are as inconsistent in your censures as in your doctrines:
You blame me for quoting the last edition of your Sermon ;
whereas you call me to account for quoting the first edition of
your Notes, concerning Enoch and Elijah; each of whom you
have proved, by a peculiar rule of Foundery-logic, to be both
in heaven and out of heaven.” So, without any remorse,
nay, being so totally unconcerned as even to break jests on
the occasion, you again “avail yourself of a mistake which
you knew was removed before you wrote.”
45. But Mr. Wesley “hath both struck out some words, and
put in others, into the sermon.” This is a common complaint
with Mr. Hill, on which therefore it is needful to explain. I generally abridge what I answer; which cannot be done
without striking out all unessential words. And I generally
put into quotations from my own writings, such words as I
judge will prevent mistakes. Now to the contradictions:
“‘If we say we have no sin’ now remaining,” (I mean,
after we are justified,) “‘we deceive ourselves.’”
I believe this; and yet I believe,
“Sin shall not always in our flesh remain.”
Again:
“Many infirmities do remain.”
This I believe; and I believe also,
“‘He that is born of God,” (and “keepeth himself,'
1 John v. 18,) * sinneth not by infirmities, whether in act,
word, or thought.”
I believe likewise, that in those perfected in love,
“No wrinkle of infirmity,
No spot of sin remains.”
My brother, at the bottom of the page, expressly says, “No
sinful infirmity.” So whether this be scriptural or not, here
is no contradiction. I have spoken so largely already concerning sins of surprise
and infirmity, that it is quite needless to add any more. I
need only refer to the “Remarks,” at the 399th and following
pages. 46. But to go on:
“I wrestle not now.”
This is an expression of my brother's, which I do not
subscribe to. “We wrestle not with flesh and blood.”
“This he allows to be his own.” (Page 31.)
Indeed I do not; although, it is true, “the perpetual war
which I speak of in the note on Eph. vi.