Wesley Corpus

I must not let it pass quite unnoticed. (1.) He “justly censures the enthu siasm and credulity of Mr. Wesley in paying so much atten tion to Bell’s ridiculous reveries.” Nay, so very little, that I checked them strongly, as soon as ever they came to my know ledge; particularly his whim about the end of the world, which I earnestly opposed, both in private and public. (2) “Bragging of the many miraculous cures he had wrought.” I bragged of--that is, simply related, the case of Mary Special, and no other; in the close of which I said, “Here are three plain facts,--She was ill; she is well; she became so in a moment. Which of these can with any modesty be denied?” I still ask the same question. (3.) That I ever called him “a sensible man,” is altogether false. A man of faith and love I then knew him to be; but I never thought him a man of sense. (4.) That I “entreated him to continue in the society,” is likewise totally false. (5.) Nor did I ever tell him, on that or any other occasion, of “the great good” he did. I know he was an instrument in God’s hands of convincing and converting many sinners. But though I speak this now to all the world, I never spoke it to himself. (6.) Neither did he ever refuse, what never was asked, “to remain in connexion with me.” (7.) Least of all did he refuse it because of my “double-dealings or unfaithful proceedings.” He never mentioned to me any such thing, nor had he any pretence so to do. (8.) Nay, but you “was at some times full of Bell's praises.” Very moderately full. “At other times,” that is, after he ran mad, “you warned the people against him.” I warned them not to regard his prophecies, particularly with regard to the 28th of February. (Journal, Vol. III., p. 130.) 20. “He also gives us a particular narration of what he rightly calls the comet-enthusiasm. Mr. John preached more than ten times about the comet he supposed was to appear in 1758, and to consume the globe.” This is a foolish slander, as it is so easily confuted.