Treatise Letter To Dr Conyers Middleton
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-dr-conyers-middleton-021 |
| Words | 389 |
4. Yet you courteously add: “If from the passages referred
to above, or any other, it should appear probable to any, that
they were favoured on some occasions with some extraordinary
illuminations, visions, or divine impressions, I shall not dispute
that point; but remind them only, that these gifts were
granted for their particular comfort; and do not therefore, in
any manner, affect or relate to the question now before us.”
(Page 10.)
I ask pardon, Sir. These do so deeply affect, so nearly
relate to, the question now before us, even as stated by your
self, (Preface, page 28,) that in allowing these you give up the
substance of the question. You yourself have declared, that
one great end of the extraordinary gifts conferred on the
Apostles was, “to enable them to bear up against the shocks
of popular rage and persecution.” Now were not “extra
ordinary illuminations, visions, and impressions,” if given at
all, given for this very end; “for their particular comfort,”
as you now word it? Therefore, in allowing these to the
apostolic Fathers, you allow extraordinary gifts which had
been formerly granted to the Apostles, to have subsisted in
the church after the days of the Apostles, and for the same
end as they did before. 5. Therefore the apostolic writers have not left us in the dark,
with regard to our present argument; and consequently your
triumph comes too soon: “Here then we have an interval of
half a century, in which we have the strongest reason to pre
sume that the extraordinary gifts of the apostolic age were
withdrawn.” (Page 9.) No; not if all the apostolic Fathers
speak of spiritual gifts as abounding among the Christians of
that age; not if “extraordinary illuminations, visions, and
divine impressions still subsisted among them.” For as to your
now putting in, “as exerted openly in the Church for the con
viction of unbelievers,” I must desire you to put it out again;
it comes a great deal too late. The question between you
and me was stated without it, above a hundred pages back. Although, if it be admitted, it will do you no service; seeing
your proposition is overthrown, if there were “miraculous
gifts after the days of the Apostles,” whether they were
“openly exerted for the conviction of unbelievers” or not. 6.