Wesley Corpus

Treatise Letter To Bishop Of Gloucester

AuthorJohn Wesley
Typetreatise
YearNone
Passage IDjw-treatise-letter-to-bishop-of-gloucester-027
Words379
Catholic Spirit Universal Redemption Primitive Christianity
Whitefield, to inquire of him whether she was not a Papist. But he quickly perceived she was only a lunatic; the nature of her disorder soon betraying itself.” Certainly then my allowing her to be mad is no proof of my partiality. I will allow every one to be so who is attended with “all these circumstances of madness.” (4.) “He pronounces sentence of enthusiasm upon another, and tells us wherefore, without any disguise: ‘Here I took leave of a poor, mad, original enthusiast, who had been scattering lies in every quarter.’” It was the famous John Adams, since confined at Box, whose capital lie, the source of the rest, was, that he was a prophet, greater than Moses, or any of the Apostles. And is the pronouncing him a madman a proof of my partiality? (5) “I had much conversation with Mr. Simpson, an ori ginal enthusiast. I desired him in the evening to give an ex hortation. He did so, and spoke many good things, in a manner peculiar to himself: ”--without order or connexion, head or tail; and in a language very near as mystical as that of Jacob Behmen. “When he had done, I summed up what he had said, methodizing and explaining it. O what a pity it is, this well-meaning man should ever speak without an inter preter!” (Page 223.) Let this passage likewise stand as it is, and who can guess how it is to prove my partiality? But by a sleight-of-hand the thing is done. “How differently does Mr. Wesley treat these two enthusiasts ! The first is accused of spreading lies of his master.” (No, he never was any disciple of mine.) “On which lfr. W. took his leave of him;--a gentle expression, to signify the thrusting him out, head and shoulders, from the society of saints.” It signifies neither more nor less than that I went out of the room and left him. “The other’s enthusiasm is made to consist only in want of method.” No. His enthusiasm did not consist in this. It was the cause of it. But he was quite another man than John Adams; and, I believe, a right honest man. (6) “I was both surprised and grieved at a genuine instance of enthusiasm. I.