Treatise Letter To Bishop Of Gloucester
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-bishop-of-gloucester-027 |
| Words | 379 |
Whitefield, to inquire of him whether
she was not a Papist. But he quickly perceived she was only
a lunatic; the nature of her disorder soon betraying itself.”
Certainly then my allowing her to be mad is no proof of my
partiality. I will allow every one to be so who is attended
with “all these circumstances of madness.”
(4.) “He pronounces sentence of enthusiasm upon another,
and tells us wherefore, without any disguise: ‘Here I took leave
of a poor, mad, original enthusiast, who had been scattering
lies in every quarter.’” It was the famous John Adams, since
confined at Box, whose capital lie, the source of the rest, was,
that he was a prophet, greater than Moses, or any of the
Apostles. And is the pronouncing him a madman a proof of
my partiality? (5) “I had much conversation with Mr. Simpson, an ori
ginal enthusiast. I desired him in the evening to give an ex
hortation. He did so, and spoke many good things, in a
manner peculiar to himself: ”--without order or connexion,
head or tail; and in a language very near as mystical as that
of Jacob Behmen. “When he had done, I summed up what he
had said, methodizing and explaining it. O what a pity it is,
this well-meaning man should ever speak without an inter
preter!” (Page 223.)
Let this passage likewise stand as it is, and who can guess
how it is to prove my partiality? But by a sleight-of-hand the
thing is done. “How differently does Mr. Wesley treat these
two enthusiasts ! The first is accused of spreading lies of his
master.” (No, he never was any disciple of mine.) “On which
lfr. W. took his leave of him;--a gentle expression, to signify
the thrusting him out, head and shoulders, from the society of
saints.” It signifies neither more nor less than that I went out
of the room and left him. “The other’s enthusiasm is made
to consist only in want of method.” No. His enthusiasm did
not consist in this. It was the cause of it. But he was quite
another man than John Adams; and, I believe, a right
honest man. (6) “I was both surprised and grieved at a genuine
instance of enthusiasm. I.