Treatise Letter To A Clergyman
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-letter-to-a-clergyman-000 |
| Words | 400 |
A Letter to a Clergyman
Source: The Works of John Wesley, Volume 8 (Zondervan)
Author: John Wesley
---
I HAVE at present neither leisure nor inclination to enter
into a formal controversy; but you will give me leave just to
offer a few loose hints relating to the subject of last night's
conversation:
1. Seeing life and health are things of so great importance,
it is, without question, highly expedient that Physicians should
have all possible advantages of learning and education. 2. That trial should be made of them, by competent judges,
before they practise publicly. 3. That after such trial, they be authorized to practise by
those who are empowered to convey that authority. 4. And that, while they are preserving the lives of others,
they should have what is sufficient to sustain their own. 5. But supposing a gentleman, bred at the University in
Dublin, with all the advantages of education, after he has
undergone all the usual trials, and then been regularly
authorized to practise :
6. Suppose, I say, this Physician settles at , for some
years, and yet makes no cures at all; but, after trying his
skill on five hundred persons, cannot show that he has healed
one; many of his patients dying under his hands, and the
rest remaining just as they were before he came:
7. Will you condemn a man who, having some little skill in
physic, and a tender compassion for those who are sick or
dying all around him, cures many of those, without fee or
reward, whom the Doctor could not cure? 8. At least did not, (which is the same thing as to the case
in hand,) were it only for this reason, because he did not go to
them, and they would not come to him? 9. Will you condemn him because he has not learning, or
has not had an University education? What then? He cures those whom the man of learning
and education cannot cure ! 10. Will you object, that he is no Physician, nor has any
authority to practise? I cannot come into your opinion. I think, Medicus est qui
medetur, βHe is a Physician who heals;β and that every man
has authority to save the life of a dying man. But if you only mean, he has no authority to take fees, I
contend not; for he takes none at all.