Treatise Free Thoughts On Public Affairs
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-free-thoughts-on-public-affairs-009 |
| Words | 392 |
What an insult upon common sense is
this wild way of talking ! If Middlesex is wronged (put it
so) in this instance, how is Yorkshire or Cumberland affected
by it; or twenty counties and forty boroughs besides; much
less all the nation? “O, but they may be affected by and
by.” Very true ! And the sky may fall ! To see this whole matter in the clearest light, let any one
read and consider the speech of Lord Chief Justice Mansfield,
on a motion, made by Lord Chatham, “to repeal and rescind
the Resolutions of the House of Commons, in regard to the
expulsion and incapacitation of Mr. Wilkes:”--
“In this debate, though it has been already spoken to. with great eloquence and perspicuity, I cannot content
myself with only giving a single vote; I feel myself under a
strong necessity of saying something more. The subject
requires it; and though the hour is late,” (it being then near
ten o’clock,) “I shall demand your indulgence, while I offer. my sentiments on this motion. “I am sure, my Lords, many of you must remember, from
your reading and experience, several persons expelled the
House of Commons, without ever this House once pretending:
to interfere or call in question by what authority they did so
I remember several myself;” (here his Lordship quoted
several cases;) “in all which, though most of the candidates
were sure to be re-chosen, they never once applied, resting
contented with the expulsatory power of the House, as the. only self-sufficient, dernier resort of application. “It has been echoed on all sides, from the partisans of this
motion, that the House of Commons acted illegally, in accept
ing Colonel Luttrel, who had but two hundred and ninety
six votes, in preference to Mr. Wilkes, who had one thousand. one hundred and forty-three. But this is a mistake of the
grossest nature imaginable, and which nothing but the intem-. perature of people's zeal could possibly transport them to, as
Mr. Wilkes had been previously considered by the laws as an
unqualified person to represent the people in Parliament;. therefore it appears very plainly, that Colonel Luttrel had a. very great majority, not less than two hundred and ninety
six, Mr. Wilkes being considered as nobody in the eye of the
law; consequently, Colonel Luttrel had no legal opposition.