Treatise Answer To Churchs Remarks
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-answer-to-churchs-remarks-021 |
| Words | 387 |
9. On the second proposition you remark, (1.) That I “ought
to have said, the merits of Christ are (not the sole cause, but)
the sole meritorious cause of this our justification.” (Page 41.)
(2.) That “ St. Paul and the Church, by justifying faith, mean,
faith in the gospel and merits of Christ.” The very thing;
so I contend, in flat opposition to those who say they mean
only the object of this faith. Upon the third proposition, “By our being justified by faith
only, both St. Paul and the Church mean, that the condition
of our justification is faith alone, and not good works;” you
say, “Neither of them mean any such thing. You greatly
wrong them, in ascribing so mischievous a sentiment to them.”
(Ibid.) Let me beg you, Sir, to have patience, and calmly to
consider, (1.) What I mean by this proposition. Why should :
you any longer run as uncertainly, and fight as one that beateth
the air? (2.) What is advanced touching the sentiments of the
Church, in the tract referred to above. Till you have done this,
it would be mere loss of time to dispute with you on this head. I wave, therefore, for the present, the consideration of some
of your following pages. Only I cannot quite pass over that
(I believe, new) assertion, “that the Thirteenth Article, enti
tled, “Of Works done before Justification, does not speak of
works done before justification, but of works before grace,
which is a very different thing!” (Page 45.) I beseech you,
Sir, to consider the Eleventh, Twelfth, and Thirteenth Arti
cles, just as they lie, in one view: And you cannot but see that
it is as absolutely impossible to maintain that proposition, as
it is to prove that the Eleventh and Twelfth Articles speak
not of justification, but of some very different thing. 10. Against that part of the fourth proposition, “Faith is
a sure trust which a man hath, that Christ loved him and died
for him,” you object, “This definition is absurd; as it sup
poses that such a sure trust can be in one who does not repent
of his sins.” (Page 48.) I suppose quite the contrary, as I
have declared over and over; nor, therefore, is there any such
danger as you apprehend.