Thoughts Upon Slavery
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | 1774 |
| Passage ID | jw-thoughts-slavery-014 |
| Words | 375 |
Where is the justice of inflicting the severest evils, on those that
have done us no wrong? Of depriving those that never injured us in word
or deed, of every comfort of life? Of tearing them from their native
country, and depriving them of liberty itself? To which an _Angolan_,
has the same natural right as an _Englishman_, and on which he sets as
high a value? Yea, where is the justice of taking away the lives of
innocent, inoffensive men? Murdering thousands of them in their own
land, by the hands of their own countrymen: many thousands, year after
year, on shipboard, and then casting them like dung into the sea! And
tens of thousands in that cruel slavery, to which they are so unjustly
reduced?
3. But waving, for the present, all other considerations, I strike
at the root of this complicated villany. I absolutely deny all
slave-holding to be consistent with any degree of natural justice.
I cannot place this in a clearer light, than that great ornament of his
profession, Judge _Blackstone_ has already done. Part of his words are
as follows:
“The three origins of the right of slavery assigned by _Justinian_,
are all built upon false foundations. 1. Slavery is said to arise
from captivity in war. The conqueror having a right to the life of
his captive, if he spares that, has then a right to deal with them as
he speaks. But this is untrue, if taken generally, That by the laws
of nations, a man has a right to kill his enemy. He has only a right
to kill him in particular cases, in cases of absolute necessity for
self-defence. And it is plain, this absolute necessity did not subsist,
since he did not kill him, but made him prisoner. War itself is
justifiable only on principles of self-preservation. Therefore it gives
us no right over prisoners, but to hinder their hurting us by confining
them. Much less can it give a right to torture, or kill, or even
enslave an enemy when the war is over. Since therefore the right of
making our prisoners slaves, depends on a supposed right of slaughter,
that foundation failing, the consequence which is drawn from it must
fail likewise.”