To 1773
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | journal |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-journal-1760-to-1773-017 |
| Words | 374 |
I preached on, “He
will not break the bruised reed, nor quench the smoking
flax.” And again God applied his word, both to wound, and
to heal them that were already wounded. About this time I wrote the following letter:
“To the Editor of the London Chronicle. “SIR, September 17, 1760. “As you sometimes insert things of a religious nature in
your paper, I shall count it a favour if you will insert this. “Some years ago I published “A Letter to Mr. Law;’
and, about the same time, “An Address to the Clergy. Of
the former, Mr. Law gives the following account, in his
‘Collection of Letters’ lately published:--
“‘To answer Mr. Wesley's letter seems to be quite
needless, because there is nothing substantial or properly
argumentative in it. I was once a kind of oracle to Mr. W-. I judged him to be much under the power of his
own spirit. To this was owing the false censure which he
published against the Mystics, as enemies to good works.’
Pp. 128, 130. “His letter is such a juvenile composition of
emptiness and pertness, as is below the character of any man
who had been serious in religion for half a month. It was
not ability, but necessity, that put his pen into his hand. He
had preached much against my books; and forbid his people
the use of them; and for a cover of all this, he promised,
from time to time, to write against them; therefore an answer
was to be made at all adventures. He and the Pope conceive
the same reasons for condemning the mystery revealed by
Jacob Behme. P. 190. “Of the latter he gives this account:--‘The Pamphlet you
sent is worse than no advice at all; but infinitely beyond Mr. Wesley's Babylonish Address to the Clergy; almost all of
which is empty babble, fitter for an old grammarian that was
Sept. 1760.] JOURNALs 19
grown blear-eyed in mending dictionaries, than for one who
had tasted of the powers of the world to come. P. 198. “I leave others to judge whether an answer to that letter
be quite needless or no; and whether there be any thing sub
stantial in it; but certainly there is something argumentative.