Wesley Collected Works Vol 9
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-9-588 |
| Words | 390 |
That we “must be baptized with the Holy Ghost,”
implies this and no more, that we cannot be “renewed in
righteousness and true holiness” any otherwise than by
being over-shadowed, quickened, and animated by that
blessed Spirit. “Our fall is nothing else but the falling of our soul from
its heavenly body and spirit, into a bestial body and spirit. Our redemption” (you mean, our new birth) “is nothing else
but the regaining our first angelic spirit and body.” (Ibid.)
What an account is here of the Christian redemption How
would Dr. Tindal have smiled at this ! Where you say, “Re
demption is nothing else but the life of God in the soul,” you
allow an essential part of it. But here you allow it to be no
thing else but that which is no part of it at all; nothing else
but a whim, a madman’s dream, a chimera, a mere non-entity! “This,” (angelic spirit and body,) “in Scripture, is called
our ‘new’ or ‘inward man.’” (Ibid.)
The “inward man” in Scripture means one thing, the
“new man” another. The former means, the mind, opposed
to the body: “Though our outward man,” our body, “perish,
yet the inward man,” the mind or soul, “is renewed day by
day.” (2 Cor. iv. 16.) The latter means, universal holiness:
“Put off the old man, which is corrupt; and put on the new
man, which, after God, is created in righteousness and true
holiness.” (Eph. iv. 22, 24.) But neither does the one nor
the other ever mean “this angelic spirit and body.”
You yourself know better what the new birth is. You
describe it better, though still with amazing queerness of
language, where you say, -
“Man hath the light and water of an outward nature to
quench the wrath of his own life, and the light and meekness
of Christ, as a seed born in him, to bring forth anew the
image of God.”
But it is not strange, that you speak so confusedly and
darkly, as you generally do, of the new birth, seeing you seem
to have no conception of that faith whereby we are born again. This abundantly appears from your frank declaration,
“We are neither saved by faith, nor by works.” (Spirit of
Prayer, Part II., p. 36.) Flatly contrary to the declaration
of St.