Wesley Collected Works Vol 9
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-9-563 |
| Words | 397 |
You attempt to prove it thus: “‘In the resurrection they
neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels.’
Here we are told, (1.) That the being male and female in one
person is the very nature of angels. (2.) That man shall be
so too at the resurrection: Therefore he was so at first.”
(Page 66.)
Indeed, we are not told here, that angels are hermaphrodites. No, nor anything like it. The whole passage is: “They who
are accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrec
tion from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage;
neither can they die any more; for they are equal unto the
angels;” (Luke xx. 35, 36;) namely, (not in being male
and female, but) in this, that they “cannot die any more.”
This is the indisputable meaning of the words. So this whole
proof vanishes into air. You have one more thought, full as new as this: “All
earthly beasts are but creaturely eruptions of the disorder that
is broken out from the fallen spiritual world. So earthly ser
pents are but transitory out-births of covetousness, envy,
pride, and wrath.” (Spirit of Love, Part II., p. 207.)
How shall we reconcile this with the Mosaic account? “And
God said, Let the earth bring forth cattle, and creeping thing,
and beast. And God made the beast of the earth; and God
saw that it was good.” (Gen. i. 24, 25.) Does anything here
intimate that beasts or serpents literally crept out of the womb
of sin? And what have serpents, in particular, to do with
covetousness, or, indeed, with envy, unless in poetic fables? 4. Of the fall of man. “Adam had lost much of his perfection before Eve was
taken out of him. “It is not good,” said God, ‘that man should
be alone.” This shows that Adam had now made that not to
be good, which God saw to be good when he created him.”
(Spirit of Prayer, p. 74.) Nay, does it show either more or
less than this, that it was not conducive to the wise ends God
had in view, for man to remain single? “God then divided the human nature into a male and
female creature: Otherwise man would have brought forth
his own likeness out of himself, in the same manner as he
had a birth from God.