Wesley Collected Works Vol 9
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-9-384 |
| Words | 393 |
If it does, then Adam brought a
sinful nature with him into the world. But if we cannot infer
from Adam’s sin, that his nature was originally corrupt,
neither can we infer from the wickedness of all mankind, be it
ever so great, that they have a sinful nature.” (Pages 52, 53.)
The consequence is not good: “If one man’s committing a
sin does not prove that he was naturally inclined to evil, then
the wickedness of all mankind for six thousand years will not
prove that they are naturally inclined to evil.” For we may
easily account for one man’s committing sin, though he was
not naturally inclined to evil; but not so easily, for “all flesh
corrupting themselves,” for the wickedness of all mankind in
all ages. It is not possible rationally to account for this, for
the general wickedness of mankind; for such a majority of
men, through all generations, being so corrupt; but on the
supposition of their having a corrupt nature. Sin in one or
a few cases, does not prove a sinful nature; but sin over
spreading the earth, does. Nor is your argument drawn from
the sin of the angels, (pp. 54, 55,) of any more force than
that drawn from the sin of Adam, unless you can prove that
as great a majority of angels as of men have rebelled against
their Creator. “Again: If our first parents felt fear and shame, and yet
their nature was not originally corrupt, then it will not follow
that ours is so, notwithstanding our uneasy and unruly pas
sions.” Empty sound ! Had any one said to Adam, “Your
nature was originally corrupt, for you feel uneasy and unruly
passions;” would he not readily have answered, “But these
began at such an hour; till then my nature was without either
pain or corruption.” Apply this to any child of Adam; and if
he can answer in like manner, “Till such an hour no uneasy
or unruly passion had any place in my breast; ” we will then
grant, these passions no more prove a corrupt nature in the
sons than in their first father. But no man can answer thus. You, and I, and every man, must acknowledge, that uneasy
and unruly passions are coeval with our understanding and
memory at least, if not with our very being.