Wesley Collected Works Vol 9
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-9-215 |
| Words | 365 |
9. You conclude this Sermon, “Let us not be led away by
those who represent the comfortable religion of Christ as a
path covered over with thorns.” (Page 14.) This cap does
not fit me. I appeal to all that have heard me at Waterford,
or elsewhere, whether I represent religion as an uncomfortable
thing. No, Sir; both in preaching and writing I representit
as far more comfortable than you do, or are able to do. “But
you represent us as lovers of pleasure more than lovers of
God.” If any do this, I doubt they touch a sore spot; I am
afraid the shoe pinches. “They affirm pleasure in general to
be unlawful, grounding it on, ‘They that are in the flesh
cannot please God.’” (Page 15.) Wrong, top and bottom. Did we hold the conclusion, we should never infer it from
such premises. But we do not hold it: We no more affirm
pleasure in general to be unlawful, than eating and drinking. This is another invention of your own brain, which never
entered into our thoughts. It is really curious when you add,
“This is bringing men “after the principles of the world, and
not after Christ.” What, the affirming that pleasure is un
lawful? Is this “after the principles of the world?” Was
ever text so unhappily applied? 10. So much for your first Sermon; wherein, though you
do not seem to want good-will, yet you are marvellously bar
ren of invention; having only retailed two or three old, thread
bare objections, which have been answered twenty times over. You begin the second, “I shall now consider some of their
many absurd doctrines: The first of which is, “the pretending
to be divinely inspired.” (Second Sermon, p. 1.) An odd
doctrine enough. “And called in an extraordinary manner
to preach the word of God.” (Pages 2-4.)
This is all harping upon the same string, the grand objection
of Lay-Preachers. We have it again and again, ten, twenty
times over. I shall answer it once for all. Not by anything
new,--that is utterly needless; but barely by repeating the
answer which convinced a serious Clergyman many years
ago:
“TULLAMORE, May 4, 1748.