Wesley Collected Works Vol 9
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-9-114 |
| Words | 400 |
We dreamed of nothing twenty-five years ago, but instructing
our pupils in religion and learning, and a few prisoners in the
common principles of Christianity. You go on: “They were
ambitious of being accounted Missionaries, immediately de
legated by Heaven to correct the errors of Bishops and Arch
bishops, and reform their abuses; to instruct the Clergy in the
true nature of Christianity, and to caution the laity not to
venture their souls in any such unhallowed hands as refused to
be initiated in all the mysteries of Methodism.” (Pages 20, 21.)
Well asserted indeed; but where is the proof of any one of these
propositions? I must insist upon this; clear, cogent proof:
Else they must be set down for so many glaring falsehoods. 4. “The Church of Rome (to which on so many accounts
they were much obliged, and as gratefully returned the obliga
tion) taught them to set up for infallible interpreters of Scrip
ture.” (Page 54.) Pray on what accounts are we “obliged
to the Church of Rome?” And how have we “returned the
obligation?” I beg you would please, (1.) To explain this;
and, (2.) To prove that we ever yet (whoever taught us) “set
up for infallible interpreters of Scripture.” So far from it, that
we have over and over declared, in print as well as in public
preaching, “We are no more to expect any living man to be
infallible than to be omniscient.” (Vol. VI. p. 4.)
5. “As to other extraordinary gifts, influences, and operations
of the Holy Ghost, no man who has but once dipped into their
Journals, and other ostentatious trash of the same kind, can
doubt their looking upon themselves as not coming one whit
behind the greatest of the Apostles.” (Methodism Examined,
p. 21.)
I acquit you, Sir, of ever having “once dipped into that
ostentatious trash.” I do not accuse you of having read so
much as the titles of my Journals. I say, my Journals; for
(as little as you seem to know it) my brother has published
none. I therefore look upon this as simple ignorance. You
talk thus, because you know no better. You do not know, that
in these very Journals I utterly disclaim the “extraordinarygifts
of the Spirit,” and all other “influences and operations of the
Holy Ghost” than those that are common to all real Christians. THE REV. MIR. DoWNES.