Wesley Corpus

But what ever you tell me where to find, I shall carefully consider. I observe but one single passage of this sort; and that you have worn threadbare already : “By the most infallible of proofs, inward feeling, I am convinced of levity and luxuri ancy of spirit, by speaking words not tending to edify; but most by my manner of speaking of my enemies.” Sir, you may print this, not only in italics, but in capitals, and yet it would do you no service. For what I was convinced of then was not uncharitableness, but, as I expressly mentioned, “levity of spirit.” 28. Of the same “uncharitable nature,” you say, is “their application of divine judgments to their opposers.” (Section xvi. p. 119, &c.) You borrow two instances from Mr. Church : But you omit the answers, which I shall therefore subjoin. His words are, “You describe Heaven as executing judg ments, immediate punishments, on those who oppose you. You say, ‘Mr. Molther was taken ill this day. I believe it was the hand of God that was upon him.’” (First Letter to Mr. Church, Vol. VIII. p. 409.) “I do; but I do not say, as a judgment for opposing me. That you say for me.” “Again, you mention,” says Mr. Church, “as an awful providence, the case of “a poor wretch, who was last week cursing and blaspheming, and had boasted to many, that he would come on Sunday, and no man should stop his mouth; but on Friday God laid his hand upon him, and on Sunday he was buried.’” “I do look on this as a manifest judgment of God on a hardened sinner for his complicated wickedness.” To repeat these objections, without taking the least notice of the answers, is one of the usual proofs of your charitable spirit. 29. You pass on to “the Methodists’ uncharitable custom of summoning their opponents to the bar of judgment.” (Section xvii. p. 123, &c.) You bring two passages from my writings to prove this. The First is, “Calling at Newgate, (in Bristol,) I was informed, that the poor wretches under sentence of death were earnestly desir ous to speak with me; but that Alderman Beecher had sent an express order that they should not.