Wesley Collected Works Vol 8
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-8-601 |
| Words | 374 |
Whitefield or Mr. Wesley; and I do not agree
with them in opinion; but I will have no more railing in my
pulpit.”
From the principles of the Methodists, you proceed to their
practice: “They hunt,” say you, “for extraordinary marks and
revelations, whereby to know the state of the soul.” The marks
by which I know the state of any soul, are the inward fruit of
the Spirit,-love, joy, peace, and meekness, gentleness, good
ness, longsuffering, temperance, patience; shown, not by words
only, but by the genuine fruit of outward holiness. Again : “They magnify their office beyond the truth, by
high pretences to miraculous inspiration.” To this assertion,
we have answered over and over, We pretend to no other inspi
ration than that which, not only every true gospel Minister,
but every real Christian, enjoys. Again: “The end of all impostors is some kind of worldly
gain; and it is difficult for them to conceal their views entirely. The love of filthy lucre will appear, either by the use they
make of it, or the means of getting it.” As to the use made of
it, you are silent. But as to the means of getting it, you say,
“Besides inhumanly wringing from the poor, the helpless
widows, the weeping orphans,” (the proof! the proof!) “they
creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with
divers lusts.” It is easy to say this, and ten times more; but
can you prove it? And ought you to say it, till you can? I shall not concern myself with anything in your Appendix,
but what relates to me in particular. This premised, I observe
on No. I. There are several instances in my Journals, of per
sons that were in agonies of grief or fear, and roared for the
qisquietness of their heart; of some that exceedingly trennbled
before God, perhaps fell down to the ground; and of others
whom God, in his adorable providence, suffered to be lunatic
and sore vexed. The particular instances hereof, to which
you refer, have been largely vindicated already, in the Two
Letters to the Rev. Dr. Church, as well as that to the late
Bishop of London. In the six following numbers I am not concerned.