Wesley Collected Works Vol 8
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-8-569 |
| Words | 370 |
4. Your Lordship begins, “There is another species of
enemies, who give shameful disturbance to the parochial
Clergy, and use very unwarrantable methods to prejudice
their people against them, and to seduce their flocks from
them; the Methodists and Moravians, who agree in annoying
the established ministry, and in drawing over to themselves
the lowest and most ignorant of the people, by pretences to
greater sanctity.” (Charge, p. 4.)
But have no endeavours been used to show them their
error? Yes; your Lordship remarks, “Endeavours have not
been wanting. But though these endeavours have caused
some abatement in the pomp and grandeur with which these
people for some time acted,” (truly, one would not have ex
pected it from them !) “yet they do not seem to have made
any impression upon their leaders.” (Ibid. p. 6.)
ThE BISHOP OF LONDON. 483
Your Lordship adds, “Their innovations in points of dis
cipline I do not intend to enter into at present. But to in
quire what the doctrines are which they spread.” (Ibid. p. 7.) “Doctrines big with pernicious influences upon prac
tice.” (Ibid. p. 8.)
Six of these your Lordship mentions, after having pre
mised, “It is not at all needful, to the end of guarding
against them, to charge the particular tenets upon the particular
persons among them.” (Ibid. p. 7.) Indeed, my Lord, it is
needful in the highest degree. For if the Minister who is to
guard his people, either against Peter Böhler, Mr. Whitefield,
or me, does not know what our particular tenets are, he must
needs “run as uncertainly, and fight as one that beateth the air.”
I will fairly own which of these belong to me. The in
direct practices which your Lordship charges upon me may
then be considered; together with the consequences of these
doctrines, and your Lordship's instructions to the Clergy. 5. “The First that I shall take notice of,” says your
Lordship, “is the Antinomian doctrine.” (Ibid. p. 8.) The
Second, “that Christ has done all, and left nothing for us to
do, but to believe.” (Ibid. p. 9.) These belong not to me. I am unconcerned therein. I have earnestly opposed, but did
never teach or embrace, them.