Wesley Collected Works Vol 8
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-8-307 |
| Words | 394 |
They began to “bear one
another’s burdens,” and naturally to “care for each other.”
As they had daily a more intimate acquaintance with, so they
had a more endeared affection for, each other. And “speaking
the truth in love, they grew up into Him in all things, who is
the Head, even Christ; from whom the whole body, fitly
joined together, and compacted by that which every joint
supplied, according to the effectual working in the measure
of every part, increased unto the edifying itself in love.”
8. But notwithstanding all these advantages, many were
at first extremely averse to meeting thus. Some, viewing it
in a wrong point of light, not as a privilege, (indeed an invalu
able one,) but rather a restraint, disliked it on that account,
because they did not love to be restrained in anything. Some
were ashamed to speak before company. Others honestly
said, “I do not know why; but I do not like it.”
9. Some objected, “There were no such meetings when I
came into the society first: And why should there now P I
do not understand these things, and this changing one thing
after another continually.” It was easily answered: It is pity
but they had been at first. But we knew not then either the
need or the benefit of them. Why we use them, you will
readily understand, if you read over the rules of the society. That with regard to these little prudential helps we are conti
nually changing one thing after another, is not a weakness or
fault, as you imagine, but a peculiar advantage which we enjoy. By this means we declare them all to be merely prudential, not
essential, not of divine institution. We prevent, so far as in us
lies, their growing formal or dead. We arc always open to
instruction; willing to be wiser every day than we were before,
and to change whatever we can change for the better. 10. Another objection was, “There is no scripture for this,
for classes and I know not what.” I answer, (1.) There is no
scripture against it. You cannot show one text that forbids
them. (2.) There is much scripture for it, even all those texts
which enjoin the substance of those various duties whereof this
is only an indifferent circumstance, to be determined by reason
and experience.