Wesley Collected Works Vol 11
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-11-129 |
| Words | 398 |
“And the
most flagrant injustice and cruelty may be practised without
remorse or pity.” (Page 20.) This is purely calculated to
inflame; for no such injustice or cruelty was ever practised,
nor was ever likely to be, either in this or any other province
of America. That which follows is a curious sentiment
indeed; I know not that ever I met with it before: “The
government of one country over another” (suppose of England
over North-America, or over the West Indian islands)
“cannot be supported but by a military force. This is a
state of oppression no country could submit to, an hour,
without an armed force to compel them.” (Page 23.) Was
ever anything more palpably false ! The English Govern
ment, both in the islands and North-America, is the
government of one country over another; but it has needed
no armed force to support it for above these hundred years:
And this Government which you would persuade them is
oppressive, all the colonies did not only submit to, but rejoice
in, without any armed force to compel them. They knew,
and felt, they were not oppressed; but enjoyed all the
liberty, civil and religious, which they could desire. 38. We come now to more matter entirely new : “No
country can lawfully surrender their liberty, by giving up
the power of legislating for themselves, to any extraneous
jurisdiction; such a cession, being inconsistent with the
unalienable rights of human nature, would either not bind at
all, or bind only the individuals that made it.” (Page 25.)
This is a home thrust. If this be so, all the English claim
either to Ireland, Scotland, or America, falls at once. But
can we admit this without any proof? Ought assertions to
pass for arguments? If they will, here are more of the same
kind: “No one generation can give up this for another.”
That is, the English settlers in America could not “give up
their power of legislating for themselves.” True, they could
not give up what they never had. But they never had, either
before or after they left England, any such power of making
laws for themselves as exempted them from the King and
Parliament; they never pretended to any such power till now;
they never advanced any such claim; nay, when this was laid
to their charge, they vehemently denied it, as an absolute
slander.