Wesley Collected Works Vol 11
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-11-128 |
| Words | 368 |
Nay, they did not enjoy either one or the other, from the
time of William the Conqueror till the Revolution. “Should
any events arise,” (and you give very broad intimations that
they have arisen already,) “which should render the same
opposition necessary that took place in the time of King
Charles the First,”--the same opposition which made the
land a field of blood, set every man’s sword against his brother,
overturned the whole constitution, and cut off, first, the
flower of the nation, and then the King himself,-“I am
afraid all that is valuable to us would be lost : The terror of
the standing army would deaden all zeal,” for these noble
exploits, “and produce a general servitude.” (Page 18.)
37. What a natural tendency has all this, to instil into
the good people of England the most determined rancour
and bitterness against their Governors, against the King and
Parliament! And what a natural tendency has all that
follows to instil the same both into the English and the
Americans ! On these passages also, I shall beg leave to
subjoin a few short observations:
“A country that is subject to the legislature of another
country, in which it has no voice, and over which it has no
control, is in slavery.” This is palpably false. Take one
instance out of many: Pennsylvania was subject (till now) to
the legislature of England, in which it had no voice, and over
which it had no control; yet it never was in slavery; it never
wanted either civil or religious liberty; nay, perhaps it
was more free in both respects than any other country in the
universe. “In a country thus subjugated to another,” (a
very improper, as well as invidious word,) “there is little or
nothing to check rapacity.” If you mean the rapacity of the
English Government, the insinuation is cruelly false; it never
existed; no such rapacity was ever exercised. “And the
most flagrant injustice and cruelty may be practised without
remorse or pity.” (Page 20.) This is purely calculated to
inflame; for no such injustice or cruelty was ever practised,
nor was ever likely to be, either in this or any other province
of America.