Wesley Collected Works Vol 11
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-11-086 |
| Words | 398 |
of depriving those that never
injured us in word or deed, of every comfort of life? of tearing
them from their native country, and depriving them of liberty
itself, to which an Angolan has the same natural right as an
Englishman, and on which he sets as high a value? Yea,
where is the justice of taking away the lives of innocent,
inoffensive men; murdering thousands of them in their own
land, by the hands of their own countrymen; many thou
sands, year after year, on shipboard, and then casting them
like dung into the sea; and tens of thousands in that cruel
slavery to which they are so unjustly reduced ? 3. But waving, for the present, all other considerations, I
strike at the root of this complicated villany; I absolutely
deny all slave-holding to be consistent with any degree of
natural justice. I cannot place this in a clearer light than that great
ornament of his profession, Judge Blackstone, has already
done. Part of his words are as follows:--
“The three origins of the right of slavery assigned by
Justinian, are all built upon false foundations: (1) Slavery is
said to arise from captivity in war. The conqueror having a
right to the life of his captives, if he spares that, has then a
right to deal with them as he pleases. But this is untrue, if
taken generally,-that, by the laws of nations, a man has a
right to kill his enemy. He has only a right to kill him in
particular cases, in cases of absolute necessity for self-defence. And it is plain, this absolute necessity did not subsist, since
he did not kill him, but made him prisoner. War itself is
justifiable only on principles of self-preservation: Therefore it
gives us no right over prisoners, but to hinder their hurting
us by confining them. Much less can it give a right to torture,
or kill, or even to enslave an enemy when the war is over. Since therefore the right of making ourprisoners slaves, depends
on a supposed right of slaughter, that foundation failing, the
consequence which is drawn from it must fail likewise. “It is said, Secondly, slavery may begin by one man’s
selling himself to another. And it is true, a man may sell
himself to work for another; but he cannot sell himself to be
a slave, as above defined.