Wesley Collected Works Vol 11
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-11-063 |
| Words | 400 |
No
man, you aver, has any power over another but by his own
consent. Of consequence, a law made without his consent
is, with regard to him, null and void. You cannot say other
wise without destroying the supposition, that none can be
governed but by his own consent. 15. See, now, to what your argument comes. You affirm,
all power is derived from the people; and presently excluded
one half of the people from having any part or lot in the
matter. At another stroke, suppose England to contain eight
millions of people, you exclude one or two millions more. At a third, suppose two millions left, you exclude three-fourths
of these. And the poor pittance that remains, by I know
not what figure of speech, you call the people of England
16. Hitherto we have endeavoured to view this point in the
mere light of reason. And even by this means it manifestly
appears that this supposition, which is so high in vogue, which
is so generally received, nay, which has been palmed upon us
with such confidence, as undeniable and self-evident, is not
only false, not only contrary to reason, but contradictory to
itself; the very men who are most positive that the people
are the source of power, being brought into an inextricable
difficulty, by that single question, “Who are the people?”
reduced to a necessity of either giving up the point, or owning
that by the people they mean scarce a tenth part of them. 17. But we need not rest the matter entirely on reasoning;
let us appeal to matter of fact. And because we cannot
have so clear and certain a prospect of what is at too great a
distance, whether of time or place, let us only take a view of
what has been in our own country for six or seven hundred
years. I ask, then, When and where did the people of England
(even suppose by that word, the people, you mean only an
inundred thousand of them) choose their own Governors? Did they choose, to go no farther, William the Conqueror? Did they choose King Stephen, or King John? As to those
who regularly succeeded their fathers, it is plain the people
are out of the question. Did they choose Henry the Fourth,
Edward the Fourth, or Henry the Seventh? Who will be so
hardy as to affirm it?