Wesley Collected Works Vol 11
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-11-033 |
| Words | 381 |
They were afraid
of the timidity of others, and dreaded nothing more than
that panic to which popular assemblies, as well as armies, are
sometimes subject. The event has shown that their fears
were groundless: The House supported its decisions against
the current of popular prejudice; and, in defending their
own judicial rights, secured the most solid part of the liberties
of their constituents. “Their firm adherence to their Resolutions was not more
noble than their concessions in the matter of their own rights
was disinterested and generous. The extensive privileges which,
in a series of ages, had accumulated to the members of both
Houses, were certainly inconsistent with the impartial distri
bution of justice. To sacrifice these privileges was not only
diametrically opposite to the idea of self-interest, with which
some asperse the Legislature, but it has also thrown a greater
weight into the scale of public freedom than any other Act passed
since the Revolution. And it has reflected honour on the present
administration, that a bill, so very favourable to the liberty of
the subject, was brought in and carried through by them. “The arbitrary manner of determining petitions about
elections has been a serious complaint, and of long continu
ance. I shall not deny to Mr. Grenville the merit of bringing
in a bill for remedying this grievance; but its passing as it
did is a certain proof that the pretended influence of admi
mistration over a majority of the House is a mere bugbear,
held forth for private views by the present opposition. “During the whole session, the House of Lords behaved
with that dignity and unalterable firmness which became the
first assembly in a great nation. Attacked with impertinent
scurrility, they smiled upon rage, and treated the ravings of
a despotic tribune with contempt. When, with an infamous
perversion of his pretended love to freedom, he attempted to
extend the control of the Peers to the resolutions of the
representatives of the people, they nobly rejected the golden
bait; and scorned to raise the dignity of their House upon
the ruins of the other. They, in short, throughout the
session, showed a spirit that disdained to be braved, a
magnanimity that diminished their own personal power for
the ease and comfort of the inferior subject.