Wesley Collected Works Vol 11
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-11-029 |
| Words | 396 |
I do not defend the measures which have been taken relative
to the Middlesex election. But let it be remembered, First,
that there was full as much violence on the one side as on
the other. Secondly, that a right of expulsion, of putting a
member out of the House, manifestly implies a right of
exclusion, of keeping him out; otherwise that right amounts
to just nothing at all. Thirdly, that consequently, a member
“expelled is incapable of being re-elected, at least during that
session; as incapable as one that is disqualified any other
way. It follows, Fourthly, that the votes given for this
disqualified person are null and void, being, in effect, given
for nobody. Therefore, Fifthly, if the other candidate had
two hundred votes, he had a majority of two hundred. Let it be observed farther, if the electors had the liberty
of choosing any qualified person, it is absolute nonsense
to talk of their being deprived of the liberty of choosing,
because they were not permitted to choose a person utterly
unqualified. But suppose a single borough or county were deprived of
this in a single instance; (which undoubtedly is the case,
whenever a person duly elected does not sit in the House;)
how is this depriving the good people of England, the nation,
of their birthright? What an insult upon common sense is
this wild way of talking ! If Middlesex is wronged (put it
so) in this instance, how is Yorkshire or Cumberland affected
by it; or twenty counties and forty boroughs besides; much
less all the nation? “O, but they may be affected by and
by.” Very true ! And the sky may fall ! To see this whole matter in the clearest light, let any one
read and consider the speech of Lord Chief Justice Mansfield,
on a motion, made by Lord Chatham, “to repeal and rescind
the Resolutions of the House of Commons, in regard to the
expulsion and incapacitation of Mr. Wilkes:”--
“In this debate, though it has been already spoken to. with great eloquence and perspicuity, I cannot content
myself with only giving a single vote; I feel myself under a
strong necessity of saying something more. The subject
requires it; and though the hour is late,” (it being then near
ten o’clock,) “I shall demand your indulgence, while I offer. my sentiments on this motion.