Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-484 |
| Words | 387 |
But though I speak this now to
all the world, I never spoke it to himself. (6.) Neither did
he ever refuse, what never was asked, “to remain in connexion
with me.” (7.) Least of all did he refuse it because of my
“double-dealings or unfaithful proceedings.” He never
mentioned to me any such thing, nor had he any pretence so
to do. (8.) Nay, but you “was at some times full of Bell's
praises.” Very moderately full. “At other times,” that is,
after he ran mad, “you warned the people against him.” I
warned them not to regard his prophecies, particularly with
regard to the 28th of February. (Journal, Vol. III., p. 130.)
20. “He also gives us a particular narration of what he
rightly calls the comet-enthusiasm. Mr. John preached more
than ten times about the comet he supposed was to appear in
1758, and to consume the globe.” This is a foolish slander,
as it is so easily confuted. A tract was published at that
very time, entitled, “Serious Thoughts occasioned by the
Earthquake at Lisbon.” The thing which I then accidentally
mentioned in preaching (twice or thrice; it may be, four times)
is there set down at large, much more at large than ever I
mentioned it in any sermon. The words are these :--
“Dr. Halley fixes the return of the comet, which appeared
in 1682, in the year 1758.” Observe, Dr. Halley does this,
not I. On which he adds: “But may the great, good God
avert such a shock or contact of such great bodies, moving
with such forces, (which, however, is by no means impossi
ble,) lest this most beautiful order of things be entirely
destroyed, and reduced into its ancient chaos.” (Serious
Thoughts, Vol. XI., pp. 8, 9.)
“But what, if God should not avert this contact? what
would the consequence be?” That consequence I afterwards
describe: “Burning up all the produce of the earth, and then
the globe itself.” But do I affirm, or suppose, that it actually
will do this? I suppose, nay, affirm, at the bottom of the same
page, the direct contrary: “What security is there against all
this, on the infidel hypothesis? But on the Christian there is
abundant security; for the prophecies are not yet fulfilled.”
21. So much for the comet-enthusiasm.