Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-450 |
| Words | 386 |
And
when I did, I was so far from
making them my creed, that
I had objections to almost
every page.” (Page 135.)
True; but neither does this
prove that I adopted his
scheme. “To instruct a person in
the nature of Christianity, I
fixed an hour a day, to read
with her in Mr. Law’s treatise
on ‘Christian Perfection.’”
I did so. And an excellent
book it is, though liable to
many objections. “Another little company of
us met: We sung, read a
little of Mr. Law, and then
conversed.”
MR. HILL's REVIEw. 395
73. “I believe the Mystic
writers to be one great Anti
christ.”
74. “Mr. F. affirms, Solo
mon is the chief of Mystics;
and Mr. W. acquiesces in the
affirmation.”
I retract this. It is far too
strong. But observe, I never
contradicted it till now ! I do not. I affirm no such
thing. Therefore all Mr. H. builds upon this is only a
castle in the air. Enoch and Elijah are in
Enoch and Elijah are not in
heaven. heaven. 75. “Enoch and Elijah en
“Enoch and Elijah are not
tered at once into the highest
in heaven, but only in para
degree of glory.” dise.” (Page 138.)
“Notes on the New Testament, John iii. 13, first edition.”
But why is Mr. H. so careful to name the first edition? Because in the second the mistake is corrected. Did he
know this? And could he avail himself of a mistake which
he knew was removed before he wrote |
For sinless perfection. Against sinless perfection. Upon this head Mr. H. employs his whole strength. I
will therefore the more carefully weigh what he advances;
only premising, before I descend to particulars, two general
observations:
(1.) Out of the twenty-five passages cited for perfection,
seventeen are taken from my brother’s Hymns. These,
therefore, strike wide. Whatever they prove, they cannot
prove that I contradict myself. (2.) Out of the twenty-five cited against perfection, four
teen are cited from the sermon on “Sin in Believers.” Do I
mean, in such believers as are “perfected in love?” Mr. H. himself knows I do not. Why then every one of these four
teen arguments is an abuse both upon me and his readers. It is the most egregious trifling that can be conceived.