Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-374 |
| Words | 392 |
“Grace reigneth through righteousness unto eternal life;”
(page 295;) that is, the free love of God brings us through
justification and sanctification to glory. “That they may
receive forgiveness, and a lot among the sanctified;” (ibid.;)
that is, that they may receive pardon, holiness, heaven. “Is not the satisfaction made by the death of Christ
sufficient to obtain both our full pardon and final happiness?”
(Ibid.) Unquestionably it is, and neither of the texts you
cite proves the contrary. “If it was requisite for Christ to be baptized, much more
to fulfil the moral law.” (Page 296.)
I cannot prove that either one or the other was requisite in
order to his purchasing redemption for us. “By Christ's sufferings alone, the law was not satisfied.”
(Page 297.) Yes, it was; for it required only the alternative,
Obey or die. It required no man to obey and die too. If
any man had perfectly obeyed, he would not have died. “Where the Scripture ascribes the whole of our salvation to
the death of Christ, a part of his humiliation is put for the
whole.” (Ibid.) I cannot allow this without some proof. “He
was obedient unto death,” is no proof at all; as it does not
necessarily imply any more, than that he died in obedience to
the Father. In some texts there is a necessity of taking a
part for the whole. But in these there is no such necessity. “Christ undertook to do everything necessary for our
redemption;” (page 300;) namely, in a covenant made with
the Father. It is sure he did everything necessary; but how
does it appear that he undertook this before the foundation
of the world, and that by a positive covenant between him
and the Father? You think this appears from four texts: 1. From that,
“Thou gavest them to me.” Nay, when any believe, “the
Father gives them to Christ.” But this proves no such
previous contract. 2. “God hath laid upon him the iniquities
of us all.” Neither does this prove any such thing. 3. That
expression, “The counsel of peace shall be between them,”
does not necessarily imply any more, than that both the
Father and the Son would concur in the redemption of man. 4. “According to the counsel of his will;” that is, in the way
or method he had chosen.