Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-370 |
| Words | 397 |
that such a thought ever entered
into his mind? The plaih meaning is, We establish both the
true sense and the effectual practice of it: We provide for its
being both understood and practised in its full extent. “On those who reject the atonement, just severity.” (Page
157.) Was it ever possible for them not to reject it? If
not, how is it just to cast them into a lake of fire for not
doing what it was impossible they should do? Would it be
just (make it your own case) to cast you into hell for not
touching heaven with your hand? “Justification is complete the first moment we believe, and
is incapable of augmentation.” (Page 159.) Not so: There
may be as many degrees in the favour as in the image of God. “St. Paul often mentions a righteousness imputed:” Not a
righteousness, never once; but simply, righteousness. “What
can this be, but the righteousness of Christ?” (Page 190.)
He tells you himself, “To him that believeth on him that justi
fieth the ungodly, faith is imputed for righteousness.” (Rom. iv. 5.) “Why is Christ styled Jehovah our Righteousness?”
Because we are both justified and sanctified through Him. “My death, the cause of their forgiveness; my righteous
mess, the ground of their acceptance.” (Page 191.)
How does this agree with page 45?--“To ascribe pardon
to Christ's passive, eternal life to his active, righteousness, is
fanciful rather than judicious.”
“He commends such kinds of beneficence only, as were exer
cised to a disciple as such.” (Page 195.) Is not this a slip
of the pen? Will not our Lord then commend, and reward
eternally, all kinds of beneficence, provided they flowed from
a principle of loving faith? yea, that which was exercised to
a Samaritan, a Jew, a Turk, or a Heathen? Even these I
would not term “transient bubbles,” though they do not
procure our justification. “How must our righteousness exceed that of the Scribes
and Pharisees? Not only in being sincere, but in possessing
a complete righteousness, even that of Christ.” (Page 197.)
Did our Lord mean this? Nothing less. He specifies, in
the following parts of his Sermon, the very instances wherein
the righteousness of a Christian exceeds that of the Scribes
and Pharisees. “He brings this specious hypocrite to the test.” (Page
198.) How does it appear that he was an hypocrite?