Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-368 |
| Words | 383 |
His
universal obedience from his birth to his death is the one
foundation of my hope.” (Page 45.)
This is unquestionably right. But if it be, there is no
manner of need to make the imputation of his active righteous
ness a separate and laboured head of discourse. O that you
had been content with this plain scriptural account, and
spared some of the dialogues and letters that follow ! The Third and Fourth Dialogues contain an admirable
illustration and confirmation of the great doctrine of Christ's
satisfaction. Yet even here I observe a few passages which
are liable to some exception:
“Satisfaction was made to the divine law.” (Page 54.) I
do not remember any such expression in Scripture. This
way of speaking of the law, as a person injured and to be
satisfied, seems hardly defensible. “The death of Christ procured the pardon and acceptance
of believers, even before he came in the flesh.” (Page 74.)
Yea, and ever since. In this we all agree. And why should
we contend for anything more? “All the benefits of the new covenant are the purchase of
his blood.” (Page 120.) Surely they are. And after this
has been fully proved, where is the need, where is the use,
of contending so strenuously for the imputation of his
righteousness, as is done in the Fifth and Sixth Dialogues? “If he was our substitute as to penal sufferings, why not
as to justifying obedience?” (Page 135.)
The former is expressly asserted in Scripture. The latter
is not expressly asserted there. “As sin and misery have abounded through the first
Adam, mercy and grace have much more abounded through
the Second. So that none can have any reason to complain.”
(Page 145.) No, not if the second Adam died for all. Other
wise, all for whom he did not die have great reason to
complain. For they inevitably fall by the first Adam, without
any help from the Second. “The whole world of believers” (page 148) is an expres
sion which never occurs in Scripture, nor has it any coun
tenance there: The world, in the inspired writings, being
constantly taken either in the universal or in a bad sense;
either for the whole of mankind, or for that part of them who
know not God.