Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-354 |
| Words | 355 |
You say, “It is both astonish
ing and provoking, that, after all, men will say, there is no
difference between their scheme and yours.” And yet, after
all, so it is: Truth is great, and will prevail. In the leading
point, that of justification, both you and they teach, “Men
are justified by a knowledge of the righteousness of Christ.”
Only they think, it is a divine, supernatural, experimental
knowledge, wrought in the inmost soul; and you think, it is
a bare historical knowledge, of the same kind with that which
the devils have. One specimen more of your unparalleled charity, which in
any but yourself would be astonishing: “If any one chooses
to go to hell by a devout path, let him study any one of those
306 LETTER. To
four famous treatises: Mr. Guthrie’s ‘Trial of a Saving Interest
in Christ; Mr. Marshal’s ‘Gospel Mystery of Sanctification;’
Mr. Boston’s ‘Human Nature in its Fourfold State;’ or Dr. Doddridge’s ‘Rise and Progress of Religion in the Soul.”
If any profane person, who desires to be converted, enter into
the spirit of those books, he thereby becomes twofold more a
child of hell than he was before.” (Page 436.)
Such is the doctrine, such is the spirit, of Palaemon |
condemning the whole generation of God’s children; sending
all his opponents to hell at once; casting arrows, firebrands,
death on every side ! But I stop. God be merciful to thee
a sinner; and show thee compassion, though thou hast none
for thy fellow-servants | Otherwise it will be more tolerable,
I will not say for Seneca or Epictetus, but for Nero or
Domitian, in the day of judgment, than for thee! W
To
BRIsTol, January 6, 1758. YoU desire my thoughts on a paper lately addressed to
the inhabitants of St. Stephen’s parish, and an answer
thereto, entitled, “A Seasonable Antidote against Popery.”
I have at present little leisure, and cannot speak so fully as
the importance of the subject requires. I can only just tell
you wherein I do or do not agree with what is advanced in
the one or the other.