Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-195 |
| Words | 391 |
We shall examine it with all
possible precision and impartiality. At a time when the
broachers of a new doctrine” (as new as the Bible) “were
kindling the fire of sedition, and shaking the foundations of
thrones and kingdoms,”--big words, but entirely void of
truth!--“was held the Council of Constance. To this was
cited John Huss, famous for propagating errors, tending to
wrest the sceptre from the hands of Kings.”--Equally true ! “He was obnoxious to Church and State.” To the Church
of Rome; not to the State in any degree. “Protestant and Catholic legislators enacted laws for
burning heretics.” How wisely are these jumbled together;
and the Protestants placed first ! But pray, what Protestant
legislator made such laws, either before or after the Catholic
ones? I know, one man, Servetus, was burned at Geneva;
but I know not that there was any law for it. And I know,
one woman, Joan Bocher, was burned in Smithfield, much
against the mind of King Edward. But what is this to the
numbers who were inhumanly butchered by Queen Mary;
to say nothing of her savage husband? “But the same laws
were executed by Queen Elizabeth and King James.” How? Did either of these burn heretics? Queen Elizabeth put two
Anabaptists to death; but what was this to the achievements
of her sister? He adds a well-devised apology for the Romish persecutions
of the Protestants as necessarily resulting from the nature of
things, and not from any wrong principles. And this he
illustrates by the treatment formerly given to the Methodists,
“whose love-feasts and watch-nights roused the vigilance of
the Magistrate, and influenced the rage of the rabble.”
Indeed, they did not. Not only no Magistrate ever objected
either to one or the other, but no mob, even in the most
turbulent times, ever interrupted them. But to the Council: “Huss strikes at the root of all tem
poral power and civil authority. He boldly asserts, that all
Princes, Magistrates, &c., in the state of mortal sin, are
deprived, ipso facto, of all power and jurisdiction. And by
broaching these doctrines, he makes Bohemia a theatre of
intestine war. See the Acts of the Council of Constance in
L’Abbe’s Collection of Councils.”
I have seen them, and I can find nothing of all this therein. But more of this by and by.