Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-178 |
| Words | 322 |
An evil practice attending this evil doctrine is, the
depriving the laity of the cup in the Lord’s supper. It is
acknowledged by all, that our Lord instituted and delivered
this sacrament in both kinds; giving the wine as well as the
bread to all that partook of it; and that it continued to be
so delivered in the Church of Rome for above a thousand
years. And yet, notwithstanding this, the Church of Rome
now forbids the people to drink of the cup ! A more insolent
and barefaced corruption cannot easily be conceived ! Another evil practice in the Church of Rome, utterly
unheard of in the ancient Church, is, that when there is
none to receive the Lord’s supper, the Priest communicates
alone. (Indeed it is not properly to communicate, when one
only receives it.) This likewise is an absolute innovation in
the Church of God. But the greatest abuse of all in the Lord’s supper is, the
worshipping the consecrated bread. And this the Church
of Rome not only practises, but positively enjoins. These
are her words: “The same sovereign worship which is due
to God, is due to the host. Adore it; pray to it. And
whosoever holds it unlawful so to do, let him be accursed.”
The Romanists themselves grant, that if Christ is not
corporally present in the Lord’s supper, this is idolatry. And that he is not corporally present anywhere but in
heaven, we learn from Acts i. 11; iii. 21. Thither he went,
and there he will continue, “till the time of the restitution
of all things.”
7. Consider we now what the Romanists hold, concerning
the sacrament of penance. “The matter of the sacrament of penance is, contrition,
confession, and satisfaction; the form, “I absolve thee.’”
We object to this: You say, “The matter of a sacrament
is something sensible,” perceivable by our senses. But if so,
penance is not a sacrament.