Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-131 |
| Words | 397 |
On the contrary, the Second Commandment teaches
us, “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or
any likeness of anything that is in heaven above,” &c. “Thou
shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them.” In
which there are two words to be considered: The one, pesel,
which we rightly translate graven image; for it properly
signifies anything carved and cut out of wood or stone; and
so it is about forty times rendered in the Greek translation,
7 Aurlov, “a graven thing.” So that an idol and an image are
there forbidden. The next word is themunah, which doth
properly signify a similitude or likeness, (as is confessed,) and
is always so translated. And thus it was understood by the
Fathers. So Justin Martyr, when he recites this law, saith,
“God forbad every image and similitude,” sixova was ouoloux. And therefore Cassander grants that the ancient Christians
“abhorred all veneration of images.” (Consult, art. 21, de
Imagin.) Indeed, the command is so express against this
practice, that there has been a kind of self-condemnation in
the Church of Rome; whilst they commonly either altogether
leave out this Commandment, (The Child's Catechism, printed
1678) or render it imperfectly and by halves: “Thou shalt
not make to thee an idol.”
Q. 45. What do they profess is their intention in the
reverence they give to images and pictures? A. They declare that the honour given to images and
pictures is referred to the prototypes, (Concil. Trid, ibid.,)
or the persons represented by them, whether God the Father,
Christ, angels, or saints; and when they fall down before
the image or picture, they worship God, or Christ, the angel,
or saint. REPLY. If an image be a representation of a divine person,
and worship be due to the image for the sake of the person
represented in it; then, such as the person is, such must the
worship be that is due to his image; and what is due to the
person, if present, is due to the image in his absence. For to
give one honour to the person, and another to the image; a
superior to the person, and an inferior to the image; is to
terminate the worship in the image, and not pass it from thence
to the person, as Gretser, the Jesuit, argues: (De Cruce, l. 1,
c. 49, sec.