Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-080 |
| Words | 392 |
But Cyprian says, “Some who had suffered tortures for
Christ, yet afterwards fell into gross, open sin.” It may be
so; but it is nothing to the question. It does not prove, in
the least, what you brought it to prove; namely, “that bad
men have endured martyrdom.” Do not evade, Sir, and say,
“Yes, torments are a kind of martyrdom.” True; but not
the martyrdom of which we speak. 9. You salve all at last, by declaring gravely, “It is not
my design to detract in any manner from the just praise of
those primitive Martyrs who sustained the cause of Christ at
the expense of their lives.” (Page 112.) No. Who could
ever suppose it was? Who could imagine it was your design
to detract from the just praise of Justin, Irenaeus, or
Cyprian? You only designed to show what their just praise
was; namely, the praise of pickpockets, of common cheats
and impostors. We understand your meaning, therefore,
when you add, “It is reasonable to believe, that they were
the best sort of Christians, and the chief ornaments of the
Church, in their several ages.” (Page 213.)
10. You conclude: “My view is to show that their martyr
dom does not add any weight to their testimony.” Whether
it does or no, “it gives the strongest proof” (as wou vourself
ThE REV. DR. MIDDLETON. 65
affirm) “of the sincerity of their faith; ” and consequently
proves that “no suspicion of fraud can reasonably be enter
tained against them.” (Ibid.) But this (which you seem to
have quite forgot) was the whole of the objection; and,
consequently, this as well as both the former objections
remain in their full force. 11. “It has been objected,” Fourthly, you say, that you
“destroy the faith and credit of all history.” (Page 114.)
But this objection, you affirm, “when seriously considered,
will appear to have no sense at all in it.” (Page 215.)
That we will try. And one passage, home to the point, is as
good as a thousand. Now, Sir, be pleased to look back. In
your Preface, page 9, I read these words: “The credibility of
facts lies open to the trial of our reason and senses. But the
credibility of witnesses depends on a variety of principles wholly
concealed from us. And though, in many cases, it may reason.