Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-042 |
| Words | 396 |
Thus, Justin himself was imposed
upon by those of Alexandria, who showed him some old ruins
under the name of cells. And so he was by those who told
him, there was a statue at Rome, inscribed, Simoni Deo
Sancto; whereas it was really inscribed, Semoni Sanco Deo;
to an old deity of the Sabines. Now,” say you, “if he was
deceived in such obvious facts, how much more easily would
he be deceived by subtle and crafty impostors!” (Pages 40,
41.) Far less easily. A man of good judgment may be
deceived in the inscriptions of statues, and points of ancient
history. But, if he has only eyes and ears, and a small degree
of common sense, he cannot be deceived in facts where he is
both an eye and ear witness. 10. For a parting blow, you endeavour to prove, Sixthly,
that Justin was a knave, as well as a fool. To this end you
remark, that “he charges the Jews with erasing three
passages out of the Greek Bible; one whereof stands there
still, and the other two were not expunged by some Jew, but
added by some Christian. Nay, that able critic and Divine,
John Croius,” (you know when to bestow honourable appel
lations,) “says Justin forged and published this passage for
the confirmation of the Christian doctrine, as well as the
greatest part of the Sibylline oracles, and the sentences of
Mercurius.” (Page 42.)
With far greater probability than John Croius asserts that
Justin forged these passages, a man of candour would hope
that he read them in his copy (though incorrect) of the Greek
Bible. And till you disprove this, or prove the assertion of
Croius, you are got not a jot farther still. But, notwith
standing you have taken true pains to blacken him, both
with regard to his morals and understanding, he may still be
an honest man, and an unexceptionable witness, as to plain
facts done before his face. 11. You fall upon Irenaeus next, and carefully enumerate
all the mistakes in his writings. As, First, that he held the
doctrine of the millennium, and related a weak fancy of
Tapias concerning it. Secondly: That he believed our
Saviour to have lived fifty years. Thirdly: That he believed
Enoch and Elias were translated, and St. Paul caught up to
that very paradise from which Adam was expelled.