Wesley Collected Works Vol 10
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-wesley-collected-works-vol-10-008 |
| Words | 378 |
“For till we have learned from
those sacred records” (I use your own words) “what they
were, and in what manner exerted by the Apostles, we cannot
form a proper judgment of those evidences which are brought
either to confirm or confute their continuance in the Church;
and must consequently dispute at random, as chance or preju
dice may prompt us, about things unknown to us.” (Page 11.)
Now, Sir, if this be true, (as without doubt it is,) then it
necessarily follows, that, seeing from the beginning of your book
to the end, you spend not one page to inform either yourself
or your readers concerning the nature of these miraculous
powers, “as they are represented to us in the history of the
gospel;” you dispute throughout the whole “atrandom, as chance
or prejudice prompts you, about things unknown to you.”
8. Your reply to “the adversaries of your scheme,” (pages
15-27,) I may let alone for the present; and the rather,
because the arguments used therein will occur again and again
Only I would here take notice of one assertion, “that the
miraculous powers conferred on the Apostles themselves were
imparted just at the moment of their exertion, and withdrawn
again as soon as those particular occasions were served.”
(Page 23.) You should not have asserted this, be it true or
false, without some stronger proof. “This, I say, is evident,”
(Ibid.,) is not a sufficient proof; nor, “A treatise is prepared
on that subject.” (Page 24.) Neither is it proved by that
comment of Grotius on our Lord's promise,” which, literally
translated, runs thus: “To every believer there was then
given some wonderful power, which was to exert itself, not
indeed always, but when there was occasion.”
9. But waving this, I grant “the single point in dispute is,
whether the testimony of the Fathers be a sufficient ground
to believe, that miraculous gifts subsisted at all after the days
of the Apostles.” (Page 27.) But with this you interweave
another question, whether the Fathers were not all fools or
knaves. In treating of which, you strongly intimate, -First,
that such gifts did never subsist; and, Secondly, that the
Apostles were equally wise and good with the “wonder
workers” (your favourite term) that followed them.