Treatise Treatise On Baptism
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-treatise-on-baptism-008 |
| Words | 372 |
iii. 8.) Now, the same promise that
was made to him, the same covenant that was made with
him, was made “with his children after him.” (Gen. xvii. 7;
Gal. iii. 7.) And upon that account it is called “an ever
lasting covenant.” In this covenant children were also obliged
to what they knew not, to the same faith and obedience with
Abraham. And so they are still; as they are still equally
entitled to all the benefits and promises of it. 5. Circumcision was then the seal of the covenant; which is
itself therefore figuratively termed the covenant. (Acts vii. 8.)
Hereby the children of those who professed the true religion
were then admitted into it, and obliged to the conditions of it;
and when the law was added, to the observance of that also. And when the old seal of circumcision was taken off, this of
baptism was added in its room; our Lord appointing one
positive institution to succeed another. A new seal was set to
Abraham’s covenant; the seals differed, but the deed was the
same; only that part was struck off which was political or cere
monial. That baptism came in the room of circumcision, appears
as well from the clear reason of the thing, as from the Apostle's
argument, where, after circumcision, he mentions baptism, as
that wherein God had “forgiven us our trespasses;” to which
he adds, the “blotting out the hand-writing of ordinances,”
plainly relating to circumcision and other Jewish rites; which
as fairly implies, that baptism came in the room of circum
cision, as our Saviour’s styling the other sacrament the pass
over, (Col. ii. 11--13; Luke xxii. 15,) shows that it was insti
tuted in the place of it. Nor is it any proof that baptism did
not succeed circumcision, because it differs in some circum
stances, any more than it proves the Lord’s supper did not suc
ceed the passover, because in several circumstances it differs
from it. This then is a Second ground. Infants are capable of
entering into covenant with God. As they always were, so they
still are, under the evangelical covenant. Therefore they have
a right to baptism, which is now the entering seal thereof. 6. Thirdly.