Treatise Thoughts Upon Necessity
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-thoughts-upon-necessity-013 |
| Words | 351 |
It may
be doubted whether God ever made an intelligent creature
without all these three faculties; whether any spirit ever
existed without them; yea, whether they are not implied in
the very nature of a spirit. Certain it is, that no being can
be accountable for its actions, which has not liberty, as well
as will and understanding. How admirably is this painted by Milton, supposing God
to speak concerning his new-made creature l--
“I made him just and right,
Sufficient to have stood, though free to fall. Such I created all the ethereal powers, -
Freely they stood who stood, and fell who fell. Not free, what proof could they have given sincere
Of true allegiance, constant faith and love,
Where only what they needs must do appear'd,
Not what they would P What praise could they receive,
What pleasure I, from such obedience paid,
When will and reason, (reason also is choice.)
Useless and vain, of freedom both despoil'd,
Made passive both, had served necessity,
Not me * They therefore, as to right belong’d,
So were created
So without least impulse or shadow of fate,
Or aught by me immutably foreseen,
They trespass, authors to themselves in all
Both what they judge and what they choose: For so
I form'd them free; and free they must remain,
Till they enthral themselves. I else must change
Their nature, and reverse the high decree,
Unchangeable, eternal, which ordain'd
Their freedom; they themselves ordain'd their fall.”
Paradise Lost, Book III. 9. It seems, they who divide the faculties of the human
soul into the understanding, will, and affections, unless they
make the will and affections the same thing; (and then how
inaccurate is the division 1) must mean by affections, the will,
properly speaking, and by the term will, neither more nor
less than liberty; the power of choosing either to do or not to
do, (commonly called liberty of contradiction,) or to do this
or the contrary, good or evil (commonly called liberty of con
trariety). Without the former at least, there can be nothing
good or evil, rewardable or punishable.