Treatise Thoughts Concerning Origin Of Power
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-thoughts-concerning-origin-of-power-001 |
| Words | 399 |
Perhaps formerly the popular government subsisted in several
states. But it is scarce now to be found, being everywhere
swallowed up either in monarchy or aristocracy. 5. But the grand question is, not in whom this power is
lodged, but from whom it is ultimately derived. What is the
origin of power? What is its primary source? This has
been long a subject of debate. And it has been debated
with the utmost warmth, by a variety of disputants. But as
earnest as they have been on each side of the question, they
have seldom come to any good conclusion; but have left the
point undecided still, to be a ball of contention to the next
generation. 6. But is it impossible, in the nature of things, to throw any
light on this obscure subject? Let us make the experiment;
let us (without pretending to dictate, but desiring every one
to use his own judgment) try to find out some ground
whereon to stand, and go as far as we can toward answering
the question. And let not any man be angry on the account,
suppose we should not exactly agree. Let every one enjoy
his own opinion, and give others the same liberty. 7. Now, I cannot but acknowledge, I believe an old book,
commonly called the Bible, to be true. Therefore I believe,
“there is no power but from God: The powers that be are
ordained of God.” (Rom. xiii. 1.) There is no subordinate
power in any nation, but what is derived from the supreme
power therein. So in England the King, in the United Pro
vinces the States are the fountain of all power. And there
is no supreme power, no power of the sword, of life and
death, but what is derived from God, the Sovereign of all. 8. But have not the people, in every age and nation, the
right of disposing of this power; of investing therewith whom
they please, either one or more persons; and that, in what
proportion they see good, and upon what conditions? Con
sequently, if those conditions are not observed, have they not
a right to take away the power they gave 7 And does not
this imply, that they are the judges whether those conditions
are observed or not? Otherwise, if the receivers were judges
of their own cause, this right would fall into nothing. 9.