Treatise Some Observations On Liberty
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-some-observations-on-liberty-029 |
| Words | 386 |
Then let
them acknowledge their benefactors. “They rejoice particu
larly in the last restraining Act: This will furnish them with
a reason for confiscating the estates of all the friends of our
Government among them.” (Page 97.) A reason / All the
friends of our Government are infinitely obliged to you for
suggesting this to them, who are full ready to improve any hint
of the kind; and it will be no wonder if they soon use these
enemies of their country as the Irish did the Protestants in 1641. 52. “One consideration more. From one end of America
to the other, they are fasting and praying: But what are
we doing? Ridiculing them as fanatics, and scoffing at
religion.” This certainly is the case with many; but God
forbid it should be the case with all ! There are thousands
in England (I believe full as many, if not many more than in
America) who are daily wrestling with God in prayer for a
blessing upon their King and country; and many join fasting
therewith; which, if it were publicly enjoined, would be no
scandal to our nation. Are they “animated by piety?”
So are we; although “not unto us be the praise.” “But
can we declare, in the face of the sun, that we are not
aggressors in this war?” We can. “And that we mean
not, by it, to acquire dominion or empire, or to gratify
resentment?” (Page 99.) I humbly believe, both the King
and his Ministers can declare this before God: “But solely
to gain reparation for injury,” from men who have already
plundered very many of His Majesty’s loyal subjects, and
killed no small number of them. 53. You now proceed to answer objections; and mention,
as the First, “Are they not our subjects?” You answer:
“They are not your subjects; they are your fellow-subjects.”
Are they indeed? Do you affirm this? Then you give up
the whole question; then their independency, which you have
so vehemently maintained, falls to the ground at once. A Second objection, you say, is this: “But we are taxed;
why should not they?” You answer: “You are taxed
by yourselves; they insist on the same privilege.” I reply,
They are now taxed by themselves, in the very same sense
that nine-tenths of us are.