Treatise Second Letter To Dr Free
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-second-letter-to-dr-free-003 |
| Words | 378 |
“The name was first given to a few persons,
who were so uncommonly methodical, as to keep a diary of the
most trivial actions of their lives, as how many slices of bread
and butter they ate, how many country dances they danced at
their dancing club, or after a fast how many pounds of mutton
they devoured. For upon these occasions they ate like lions,
having made themselves uncommonly voracious.” Of this, not
one line is true; for, (1.) It was from an ancient sect of Phy
sicians, whom we were supposed to resemble in our regular diet
and exercise, that we were originally styled Methodists. (2.) Not
one of us ever kept a diary of “the most trivial actions” of
our lives. (3) Nor did any of us ever set down, what, or how
much, we ate or drank. (4.) Our “dancing club” never ex
isted; I never heard of it before. (5.) On our “fast-days.”
we used no food but bread; on the day following, we fed as on
common days. (6.) Therefore our voraciousness and eating
like lions is also pure, lively invention. You go on: “It was not long before these gentlemen began
to dogmatize in a public manner, feeling a strong inclination to
new-model almost every circumstance or thing in the system of
our national religion.” Just as true as the rest. These gen
tiemen were so far from feeling any inclination at all “to new
model” any “circumstance or thing,” that, during their whole
stay at Oxford, they were High Churchmen in the strongest
sense; vehemently contending for every “circumstance” of
Church order, according to the old “model.” And in Georgia
too, we were rigorous observers of every Rubric and Canon; as
well as (to the best of our knowledge) every tenet of the
Church. Your account, therefore, of the rise of the Method
ists is a mistake from beginning to end. I proceed to your definition of them: “By the Methodists,
was then and is now understood, a set of enthusiasts, who, pre
tending to be members of the Church of England, either offend
against the order and discipline of the Church, or pervert its
doctrines relating to faith and works, and the terms of salva
tion.”
Another grievous mistake.